Knowledge Contract v3 — синтез I26

This specification defines a target design for Knowledge Contract v3 (target identifier `3.0.0-draft.1`): a versioned, bounded package of meaning content for a declared purpose of use. It links typed content to requirements, scope, sources, dependencies, preservation obligations and observations. The text describes nine logical groups, six selective profiles, separate validation levels, and a limited migration of a six-field legacy subset. A concrete carrier, `kc-synthesis/0.1`, is covered only within its own stated scope.

Редакционная иллюстрация; не результат эксперимента.

Ниже — исходное английское резюме, а не полный перевод. Ссылка на полный русский оригинал находится ниже.

FieldValue
Artifact idMM_A0225 (permanent)
Entry page revisionMM_A0225-entry-en-r1
Full textRussian original, language: Russian
Statusscientific draft (concept_draft); not a finished result
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Abstract

This specification defines a target design for Knowledge Contract v3 (target identifier 3.0.0-draft.1): a versioned, bounded package of meaning content for a declared purpose of use. It links typed content to requirements, scope, sources, dependencies, preservation obligations and observations. The text describes nine logical groups, six selective profiles, separate validation levels, and a limited migration of a six-field legacy subset. A concrete carrier, kc-synthesis/0.1, is covered only within its own stated scope.

Claims and their basis

  • A contract is a versioned package for a declared purpose; its content type is preserved (an extracted instruction is not an accepted norm). Basis type: not-a-claim (normative definition).
  • Core instance: nine logical groups, with unknown scope kept distinct from "known to be absent"; profiles are a separate extension container, and an unknown required profile blocks application. Basis type: not-a-claim (normative rules).
  • Structural validation, reference and obligation checks, and application assessment against supplied context are separate levels; a positive result does not establish source truth, real fulfilment of a requirement, or authenticity of evidence. Basis type: not-a-claim (scope statement).
  • Finite executed checks on the carrier: the first author run passed 35 of 35 ordinary scenarios, and a separate in-team challenge run passed 26 of 26 (six valid positives, seventeen correct refusals, three migration checks). Basis type: finite-test.
  • In the same runs, two author stress inputs and four challenge stress inputs with falsely trusted markup were accepted by the model; they are excluded from the conformance share and mark a limit of source admission. Basis type: finite-test (negative result).
  • An exploratory strong plain-text form matched the contract on the shared area (9 of 9 each: three admissions, six refusals). Superiority is not established; the comparison was not preregistered and does not measure cost. Basis type: finite-test.

Limits

  • Real professional work, source truth and general usefulness are not confirmed here.
  • Coverage checks test presence of a requirement unit, not actual fulfilment; visual checks test a declared modality, not bytes or legibility; reasoning checks test declared references, not truth of premises.
  • The instance revision or digest is not yet bound into attempt and evidence records; global attempt uniqueness, idempotency and observation of real external effects are not implemented.
  • The specification does not declare production readiness, a published standard or a finished serialisation, and migration does not claim semantic equivalence or lossless round trips.

Status and what is open

  • The late research synthesis gate is open.
  • Independent semantic review of this text has not been performed.
  • The English page is a summary, not a translation, and does not replace the Russian original.
  • Open by the specification's own account: full binding of the instance to execution and acceptance, and privacy filtering of diagnostics.

Relation to the full text

This page summarises the specification's own statements; it adds no claims. The full text is a draft whose own front matter marks it concept_draft. No separate editorial review wording exists for specifications yet.

Credit and licence

Based on Knowledge Contract Arcana, https://contract.place (CC BY 4.0). Licence: CC BY 4.0. Credit lines and how to cite: ATTRIBUTION.md; rights holder statement for the repository: NOTICE; third-party sources: SOURCES.md.

Павел Валентов · Knowledge Contract Arcana · CC BY 4.0. Текст сохранён; оформление адаптировано. Открыть оригинальный источник