以下为原始英文概要,并非全文翻译。完整俄文原文链接见下方。
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Artifact id | MM_A0200 (permanent) |
| Entry page revision | MM_A0200-entry-en-r1 |
| Full text | Russian original, language: Russian |
| Status | scientific draft (concept_draft); not a finished result |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Abstract
Reusing knowledge requires transformations: normalisation, reduction, joining sources, inference, parametrisation and transfer to a new situation. The paper proposes a transition contract linking input editions, the permitted effect, preconditions, postconditions, protected properties, assumptions, losses and the actual output. Geometric similarity only selects candidates. Conditional properties are arguments under explicit premises, and hypotheses about the benefit of the profile are untested; the appendix keeps limited executed experiments that do not confirm them. It does not claim a universal computable algebra of human meaning.
Claims and their basis
- The architecture has three levels (content, operation, execution); substituting one for another produces false promises, since a correct schema does not guarantee correct inference. Basis type: authors-domain-assessment; a design stance, not a theorem.
- Ten conditional properties CP01-CP10 are arguments under explicit premises, not proofs and not empirical results. A worked three-step chain shows that a dropped condition is not restored by an old report. Basis type: authors-domain-assessment.
- Four hypotheses need empirical evaluation. Basis type: hypothesis; the appendix does not establish them.
- Appendix logs for the three books hold 100 culinary, 41 automatic and 28 navigation operations, all marked
auto_applied_unreviewed. The first literal mapping linked 100 of 100, 41 of 41 and only 21 of 28; a later mapping reproduced and reversed all 28, and the failed first attempt is kept. Basis type: finite-test. - Vectors matched in 13 of 20 canonical pairs, which is not evidence that the carriers are equivalent; 7 of 20 differed. Basis type: finite-test.
- A release cross-check by the kit authors tested idempotence and join for skill-dependency closure on all 4096 subsets of 12 skills. Basis type: authors-domain-assessment; a self-check by one assistant, covering finite-traversal laws, not an algebra of meaning, with geometry not implemented.
Limits
- The navigation readable file did not reproduce whole, and three captions fell into alt-text; reversing an operation over one block is not restoring the full artifact.
- The finite profile does not test recognition of arbitrary phrases, implicit domain models or visual understanding. No execution report of it was read.
- Practical confirmation needs permitted pages of three books, fixed OCR/VLM versions and independent labelling; counts of documents are not a measure of truth.
Status and what is open
- The late research synthesis gate is OPEN. Independent semantic review of this text has NOT been performed.
- The English page is a summary, not a translation, and does not replace the Russian original.
- The sources MM_A5295, MM_A10271 (mapping history) and MM_A5300 (gap plan) were NOT read by the card writer; claims resting on them keep the limited wording above.
- The research crosswalk is integrated but is a one-assistant self-check by the kit authors, not independent confirmation.
- A later engineering amendment separates migration of representation paths from semantic transformation; it is a layout change, and the report behind it was not checked.
- Not integrated and still missing: the NAV reports, the TIM reports, MM_OBLIGATIONS_20261030 together with the previous-stage report, the runs behind section 7 of the knowledge-admission amendment (MM_KA0004), and the items ING-01 to ING-08.
Relation to the full text
The Russian full text is the terminology edition of 2026-11-03 (front matter and links aside). Where the editorial card corrects the status wording of its abstract (appendix experiments that an unscoped "not tested" would understate), this page follows the corrected, evidence-bound wording and says so here. The Russian text is published without the card corrections, so its abstract may differ from this page.
Credit and licence
Based on Knowledge Contract Arcana, https://contract.place (CC BY 4.0). Licence: CC BY 4.0. Credit lines and how to cite: ATTRIBUTION.md; rights holder statement for the repository: NOTICE; third-party sources: SOURCES.md.
Pavel Valentov · Knowledge Contract Arcana · CC BY 4.0。保留文字,调整呈现方式。 打开原始来源
